In 1980 the Virginia Department of Health asked toxicologist Brian
Dementi. PhD, to review the available literature relating to the health effects of
fluoride. Dementi concluded: “With regard to fluoridation, this writer is of the opinion
that the evidence of adverse health effects is of such magnitude and human
beings so varied in their individual constitution, state of health at any
moment, eating and drinking habits, etc., that it is inappropriate to say that
fluoridation is a totally healthful and safe practice for all."
Further, Dementi writes, "Widespread exposure to fluoride coupled with
an inadequate data base substantiating it to be safe is a cause of great
concern. The public consumes fluoride from drinking water, tooth paste, mouth
washes, etc. with little or no advice as to how much fluoride is enough or too
much. The evidence as cited herein indicates some adverse health or metabolic
effects right at, or very close to, the 1 ppm level, with no margin of safety
respecting such effects established of the nature generally sought for toxic
substances. It is possible that many individuals out of the large number
consuming fluoridated water are suffering in varying degrees health detriment
attributable to this recognized toxic substance.” http://www.scribd.com/doc/16925697/Dementi-Fluoride-Report
Dementi
writes, “Every effort has been made in
this report to adhere to the ideal of presenting only scientific information and
discussion pertaining to it. “
‘This
report is not complete. The evaluation of the health effects of fluoride must
continue as long as the substance is found in drinking water, tooth paste, mouth
rinses, etc., and concern exists as to its safety.”
‘Furthermore, where the
kidney is concerned persons with impaired kidney function may suffer from acute
fluoride toxicity when consuming water containing as little as 2 ppm
fluoride”
‘The
finding of Hirata in Japan of a decrease in white blood corpuscles and
neutrophils in children of prepuberty age, which was correlateable with the
extent of dental mottling observed where the drinking water containing 1-5 ppm
fluoride, is a serious and important finding.”
‘There is
the added question of Down’s syndrome to be reckoned with. Work has been cited
showing a dose related association between fluoride and the incidence of Down’s
syndrome where fluoride levels in the drinking water ranged from 0.1 to 2.6 ppm.
Though this work has been seriously criticized, the fact remains that no study
satisfactorily refutes the findings. The possibility of a fluoride related
increased incidence of Down’s syndrome remains.”
'Since it appears that a serious question
remains concerning a possible causative relationship between fluoride
ingestion and Down's syndrome, one would think that, in view of the
widespread human exposure, efforts directed toward obtaining definitive
results should have been undertaken or certainly should be in progress."
‘The
Physicians Desk Reference (1979) indicates fluoride may cause a variety of
symptoms such as skin eruptions, eczema, gastric distress, headache, weakness,
etc. in hypersensitive individuals.”
' Out of 110 million persons consuming water
containing fluoride, there may be many experiencing such symptoms who have no
idea that fluoride in the drinking water may be the
cause.”
"In discussing the effects of fluoride upon the kidney, it seems appropriate at this point to indicate that whereas the kidney fulfills the important task of removing toxic substances, such as fluoride, from the system. There is the consequent danger of fluoride tintoxication in those individuals with impaired renal function who ingest fluoride...It is evident that fluoridated water poses an enhanced threat to those among the populace who have impaired kidney function."
"In referring to average blood fluoride levels little consideration is given to individuals who, for one or more of a variety of reasons, may have fluoride levels well above the average...Arguments such as these suggest that fluoride levels in the blood of a certain fraction of human drinking fluoridated water may be within the range where perturbation of DNA repair is manifest and that at some point in the time such perturbations may have serious consequence.
No comments:
Post a Comment